• Ancient Digger teaches Archaeology and History to all Ages!

Sunday, July 5, 2015

Advice, Tips, and Resources for Aspiring Archaeologists


In 2011, I wrote the Beginner's Guide to a Career in Anthropology or Archaeology. At that time, I was completing my undergraduate degree in anthropology, and had only begun to explore the many areas and disciplines you could pursue after college. Sitting in my crowded classes, with close to 500 students, I began to ponder why these students had chosen this field. I felt a bit older than those fresh faced college students, whom had just exited their senior year at high school, and were open and excited to explore a new path.

I, on the other hand, knew what I wanted to do while I was sitting in my first Intro to Anthropology class. I wasn't there for an elective for a degree in psychology, or whatever degree required me to have a few classes that I was barely interested in just to graduate. I was there to explore my future. A future in digging in the dirt. A practice we loved as children. Those individuals that never wanted dirt under their finger nails, or who couldn't go outside without the right pair of shoes, their hair done, a clean shave, or full makeup, would never hack it in the field. Those were the students I sat next to. While they were thinking where the next party would be, I was thinking about studying, and more studying. I actually enjoyed the less than funny jokes about archaeology my professors told, however I may have only understood them because I was older.  It was a happy time *smile*.

Those Who Can't Dig throughout the Year, Warp Young Minds

I'm always amazed by archaeologists who spend their years teaching a room full of inspired and hopeful young archaeologists, but I'm also incredibly surprised at the directions those archaeologists choose after graduating. Some find that working in the field is no where near as glamorous as they once thought. We have, however,  the Indiana Jones movies to thank for this sometimes careless ideal of seeking truth through artifacts, or riches through the looting and pillaging of archaeological sites.

Sitting in my graduate level classes, I could just sense the passion of my professors, but it was also clear that teaching was sometimes a drag. They would often say they'd rather be in the field, but they detested those weeks and months of pillaging through data, and sorting their records and samples that were sometimes categorized incorrectly by a volunteer, or a student assistant.

We all know that at the college level, professors are required to do research. If you know this going in, then why make a point of reminding students that it's a drag. It's part of the process, and while many professors expressed their frustration, there were others that inspired students to change their entire way of thinking about the past. It wasn't until an Anthropology Method's class that I really started to appreciate anthropology more so than archaeology.

My favorite professor had completed his PhD at the University of Pennsylvania, and he challenged his students to stop just taking down notes from Powerpoints, and to think and reflect about the information we have in the present. One of my favorite books in that class was Visions of Culture, An Introduction to Anthropological Theories and Theorists.  The other textbook, the title escapes, included studies from anthropologists like Franz Boas and Ruth Benedict.  We were required to read two articles a week, and then write a reflection paper about something in those articles that struck a nerve with us.  Needless to say, I always found something that would make me shout something out loud.

I remember reading “The Methods of Ethnology” by Franz Boas. Boas attacks evolutionary theorists because in reality he supports method without theory, and to my understanding, one cannot exist without the other. Boas supported the Darwinian model of biological evolution but was hostile to its application to social evolution. The term “social organism” comes to mind once again, which was made quite famous by Herbert Spencer, which combines both evolution and societal issues in one. Why such a favoritism towards the scientific? Can’t anthropology be scientific and unscientific?

This class alone made me change my entire educational path. I was no longer interested in just digging holes. I wanted to study and help people, and it usually helped if they were still alive and kicking *smile*. The moral of the story is, you can start your education and think that this area is the one you will stick with, but once you start taking the diverse classes offered, you will start to realize that things are not always what they seem.

Reasons why you should become an archaeologist or an anthropologist

Whatever your reason for pursuing a career in either anthropology or archaeology, it's important to know the reasons why you should become an archaeologist. Perhaps you want to teach people about the past through material goods you discover. You may just have been that curious kid that questioned everything, and accepted no opinion without proper evidence-the budding researcher was slowly emerging.


For me, well, it was more than going on a few digs for the local archaeological society. And, I know this will sound cliche, and Indiana Jones would say if you want to be a good archaeologists, get out of the library, I started bringing my books with me to sites, and reading. I did a lot of reflection, and envisioning of the past. I was so deeply enthralled with a sugar mill here in Florida, Cruger and Depyster, that a tourist asked me if I could explain the history of the site. It was my first time there, and the only information I had with me was a google map, printed at that time, with the name of the site at the top. I was well equipped with a $100 Kodak Digital camera, that lasted me more than 5 years, even though it was dusty, and often filled with remnants of a site I had just traveled to. I couldn't really share much, but I tried to explain about the Seminole Wars, the sugar industry, slavery, and how the Seminoles have evolved today.  Trust me, 19th century history is not my thing. I was always more interested in the crusades and templars, and then I wrote a piece on the Uruk Period Kings, and grew quite obsessed with cylinder seals. I mean, who gets exited about a clay tag? Archaeologists do, that's who.

But, what really did for me was visiting the Castillo de San Marcos in St. Augustine as a child, and digging in the fossil beds of Caesar's Creek in Ohio during a class trip. On my last trip back to Ohio, my mom asked me what I wanted to do for the day. I told her I wanted to dig for fossils, and off we went. That day, I picked up a few trilobites, coral, and cephalopods to take home. You can only remove certain sized fossils, and you are required to purchase a license to dig, which we did. If you are ever in the area, pick up a $5 license at the US Army Corps of Engineers Visitor Center, where they also have a wonderful display of the 450-500 million year fossils from the Ordovician Sea.

Read: 30 Reasons Why You Should Become An Archaeologist 

What's the message here? Are you even a practicing archaeologist?

The answer to that question is yes and no. I don't presently dig in the dirt, I warp young minds. I consider myself to be more of an anthropologist than an archaeologist. That's not to say that I never was an archaeologist.  I like to think that I evolved from an archaeologist to an anthropologist. When life became more real, and I started living more so in the present, while still appreciating the past, things changed.  And while I still love to share archaeological stories, because that's where it all began, in the present, I am studying young learners, and also learning about their heritage, language, and culture. Above all, I've always enjoyed research, and I love helping people achieve their goals, whether that's by assisting them in searching for schools for archaeology or looking for scholarships. That's just my way!

So, in fitting with the site's motto, 
An Ancient Digger is anyone, not just an archaeologist, who digs for knowledge, truth, reason, science and education, and strives to share that knowledge with everyone.

Helpful articles to start your research into becoming an archaeologist or starting an anthropology or archaeology program

  • Guide To Archaeology and Anthropology Graduate School 101––I recently attended a seminar featuring Dr. John Walker, Professor Peter Sinelli, and Dr.John Schultz from the University of Central Florida. The seminar focused on the Do's and Don'ts of applying to graduate school for archaeology and anthropology and was organized by Hominids Anonymous Anthropology Club.
  • Best Graduate Schools for Linguistics––Many students find phonics, semantics, and pragmatics of linguistics programs far too fascinating to pass up as a degree goal. Studying linguistics provides a scientific foundation for broad-based study of human communication that is usually broken into three main subfields, including language meaning, language context, and language form.
  • Best Graduate Schools for Classical Archaeology––Classical archaeology is a deeply interesting subject that has enchanted researchers and students for ages. Quite simply, it is the study of archaeological excavations from Ancient Greece and Rome. However, some only consider it to be the study of the Roman and Athenian civilizations, but it can include other subjects such as Minoan and Crete civilizations.
  • Best Schools for Biological and Evolutionary Anthropology and Archaeology––These schools for Biological and Evolutionary Anthropology and Archaeology are not ranked in any specific order, as I believe they contribute to these fields in their own unique ways. I have put the main area of focus next to the college name, but please remember, many of the biological and evolutionary programs are combined into one department at some schools.

Tuesday, June 30, 2015

Archaeology News: June 30, 2015


Ancient Digger brings you the latest archaeology news and headlines everyday of the week!

Archaeologists keep digging where potentially 2,000-year-old mummy was found

Archaeologists are continuing to search the site of a proposed stone quarry in south Lake County where they found a mummy that could be 2,000 years old. They have secured the mummified human remains and kept them in place while continuing work around them at the construction site, according to the Indiana Department of Natural Resources

Azhagankulam was in the big league

Renewed excavation from May at Azhagankulam village in Ramanathapuram district, Tamil Nadu, has thrown up fresh evidence that it was an important trading post between the Sangam Pandyas and the Romans from circa 50 BCE to circa 500 CE.

Rare ceramic of second century BC found in Chhattisgarh mud fort

Rare ceramic pieces of northern black polished ware (NBPW) dating back to second century BC was unearthed from a 2000-year-old mud fort site at Damroo in Baloda Bazaar-Bhatapara district of Chhattisgarh.

Archaeologists dig in as quarry site search continues

Archaeologists are continuing their investigation of the human remains found at the site of the planned Singleton stone quarry in Eagle Creek Township. Marty Benson, assistant director of communication with the Department of Natural Resources, said Monday there is not much to tell at this point regarding the remains, their origin or age, or how they came to rest on the property.

Countdown starts for Diyarbakır’s World Heritage site bid

Site preparations have finished in Turkey’s eastern province of Diyarbakır, whose ancient sites may soon receive world heritage status. The 5,700-meter long and 12-meter high historical walls, along with the 700-hectare Hevsel Gardens, which are a like an open-air museum and symbol of the city, are waiting for UNESCO’s World Heritage status decision.

Indiana Joneses run hi-tech race against Islamic State

Some of the Middle East's most highly prized archaeological treasures are under threat from the extremist militants of Islamic State (IS). So archaeologists are desperately trying to record as much of these sites as they can. And, in contrast to Indiana Jones and its low-tech bullwhip, they're using the latest technology to do it.

Thursday, July 17, 2014

Archaeology News: July 17, 2014


Ancient Digger brings you the latest archaeology news and headlines everyday of the week!

Archaeologists Discover 9,000 Year-Old Talisman Meteorite That Was Worshipped By Primitive People




A meteorite fragment dating back 9,000 years was discovered in a shaman's hut by archaeologists, leading to speculation that it was worshipped as a magical object, UK MailOnline reported. Since prehistoric Stone Age humans witnessed the talisman fall from space, it had gained a status of being from another world.

Archaeologists Are Hunting for the Lost French Fleet That Nearly Conquered Spanish Florida


A new archaeological investigation off the coast of Cape Canaveral could shed light on one of the defining moments of Florida's history--when the Spanish definitively kicked the French out of the territory they'd claimed as their own.

When you think of the oldest European settlements in what is now the United States, Jamestown, The Lost Colony, Plymouth and St. Augustine might come to mind. But the French settlement of Fort Caroline, older than all of them, almost never gets a mention.

NC Archaeologist Has Find-Of-A-Lifetime, 3 Years In A Row





A team of archaeologists turned up another mosaic. Part of the image depicts an elephant with shields tied to its side.

"Nowhere in the Hebrew Bible are there stories with elephants in them," Magness says. "So clearly this scene is not drawn ... from the Old Testament." This is the first time that a non-Biblical story has been found in any ancient synagogue.Jodi Magness suggests that the image might be a depiction of a legend about a meeting between Alexander the Great and a Jewish high priest. This conjecture will require intense study.

10,000yo Indian cave paintings of ‘aliens, spaceship’ puzzle archaeologists

Prehistoric paintings in a cave in India may indicate that alien travelers visited the site eons ago, an archeologist says. The paintings depict what appear as humanoids with featureless faces and a tripod object that could be a vehicle.



Archaeologists to dig at Luas site after 17th Century body find

A team of archaeologists were called to a site outside the front gates of Trinity College Dublin yesterday after the remains were discovered. The alarm was raised after 9am as workers were removing utilities ahead of the installation of the new Luas route. A hip bone and two leg bones were found 1.5 metres underground. They had been buried in a crouching position. An initial inspection revealed the remains could date back to the 17th Century.

Archaeologists Find 8,000-Year-Old Skull, but It’s What Was Inside That Counts

Researchers are not yet sure if it’s human, but an ancient skull found at a Norwegian archaeological dig site is exciting scientists because of what they think they discovered inside — brain matter. The bones, thought to be about 8,000 years old, were uncovered at a camp in Stokke, Norway, and could be evidence of a Stone Age man.

Archaeologists Discover New Extinct Elephant Relative

The new evidence puts the gomphothere in North America at the same time as a prehistoric group of paleo-Indians known as the Clovis culture, whose beautifully crafted projectile points helped bring down giant Ice Age mammals, includingmammoths. This is the first time gomphothere fossils have been discovered with Clovis artifacts.

Cambridge University archaeologists unearth prehistoric bookkeeping system

Excavations have unearthed an ancient token-based recording system which was believed to have been rendered obsolete by the invention of writing.

Sunday, July 15, 2012

This Week’s Popular Stories: Sunday July 15, 2012


Thursday, November 10, 2011

Anthropology Focus: Sherry Ortner's Contradictions


I had an incredibly difficult time finding fault with Sherry Ortner’s research. Yes, she’s a feminist who has contended that women are universally devalued, and in some degree, inferior to men. Some women are inferior to men in brutal strength and intelligence, but it’s also the other way around. The fact, according to Ortner, that this idea is culturally universal is grossly erroneous. Ortner later retracts some of her earlier arguments about the inferiority of women in a previous paper, in her retrospective essay.

Ortner admits that gender equality is more difficult to assess than she originally thought because cultures are more contradictory and dynamic. Why the sudden change and reflection? The fact that she has succumbed to criticism and revised her own work to satisfy the masses is for lack of the better sense, a copout. Part of doing anthropology is having your own opinion, and pushing the limits is just want you want to do, not avoid.

Additionally, I believe that her studies involving symbolism have given her a skewed outlook of what they really represent. Ortner’s symbolic studies have virtually blinded her to what certain symbols could represent, instead of what the masses as a whole, and based on hundreds of years of assimilation, agree on what they stand for. Take for instance American culture in the 1950’s. Ortner is a child of the 50’s. What exactly was happening at this time? Were there equal rights for women? Class and racial inequality? Was the middle class actually shrinking at this time? Was Marx right? Evidently, Ortner’s research has given me so many questions and concerns I don’t know where to start. Remember, I like agendas. Ortner’s views from the 50’s can hardly be compared to now. Why? You can’t really make a comparison if nothing has changed.

Ortner says herself that the United Sates is described “as a nation where anyone can grow up to become president”. It’s a contradiction to be truthful because we know not everyone can. My concern, however, is why doesn’t Ortner take more of her experiences from high school and compare them to how society had changed, or how it hasn’t? Explaining why everyone can’t be president. The American Flag, a summarizing symbol at Ortner notes, representing freedom and democracy, and national superiority, is a contradiction. Why do I think it’s a contradiction? To some Americans it represents the complete opposite. Why doesn’t Ortner use the American flag and describe it from a 1950’s point of view? Maybe I can’t tell the difference between a 1950’s opinion of America or a 21st century opinion.

In closing, you can never summarize a symbol, because it will always have more than one interpretation. Furthermore, those symbols can always be contradicted by different viewpoints. The key is to never falter and give in to criticisms because without your voice, you’re just another conformist.

Like Ancient Digger? Why Not Follow Us?


Subscribe Via RSS Feed Follow Ancient Digger on Facebook Follow Ancient Digger on Twitter Subscribe to Ancient Digger Via Email

Get widget

Search

 

Ancient Digger Archaeology Copyright © 2015 LKart Theme is Designed by Lasantha