How should the historian deal with the biblical texts on the one hand and archaeological data on the other? The collapse of “biblical archaeology” has left many scholars without any agreed procedure. At one pole is a clique clinging to “biblical historicity”; at the other pole are those who want to construct a purely archaeological history.
Between the poles lie the rest of us, apparently uncertain as to how to proceed. Some claim that biblical texts and archaeology largely do not intersect, and others that the biblical texts have virtually no relationship to history, some work ad hoc. I’m not going to provide names here, because any individual scholar may resent being crudely labelled.
Read the Entire post: Bible and Archaeology: Another try
By Emeritus Professor Philip Davies
University of Sheffield, England
Thursday, September 27, 2012
The Collapse of Biblical Archaeology
0 Comments:
Post a Comment
We appreciate comments, but we delete SPAM.