• Ancient Digger teaches Archaeology and History to all Ages!

Friday, June 22, 2012

Royal Armouries Conference: The English Civil Wars: the politics, battles, equipment and archaeology


The Royal Armouries, England’s National Museum of Arms and Armour, is holding a one-day conference on the English Civil Wars on the 15th of September, 2012. The English Civil Wars: the politics, battles, equipment and archaeology, will take place from 10:00-6:00PM, in association with The Battlefields Trust, in Leeds.

The conference will examine the causes of the English Civil War and discuss in detail some of the most significant battles plus the social, political and historical impact on the British Isles caused by this tumultuous period of conflict. The conference also seeks to educate people about the arms and equipment of the English Civil Wars and the battles made possible by recent advances in battlefield archaeology.

Speakers from the Royal Armouries include:


---Jonathon Riley (Master of the Armouries),
---Thom Richardson (Keeper of Armour)
---Graeme Rimer (former Academic Director).

Visiting speakers include:


---Chris Scott (English Civil Wars author & histrorian),
---Martin Marix Evans (The Naseby Battlefield Project)
---Natasha Ferguson (National Museums Scotland)
---Brian Godwin (Independent Scholar)
---Micheál Ó Siochrú (Trinity College Dublin)
---Katherine Elliott (Independent Scholar)

TICKETS


---£45 including lunch
---£35 including lunch (60+, students & registered unemployed)

A unique handling session, led by specialist curators, will be held on Friday 14 September, 5-6.30pm. A selection of English Civil War objects will be available for close examination. Numbers are limited please book early.---Tickets £10

To book your spot for the  The English Civil Wars: the politics, battles, equipment and archaeology conference, please printout the booking form and send it back to the appropriate contact.



Monday, December 12, 2011

Lysistrata: What is Tells Us About Women in Warfare


The Lysistrata by Aristophanes explored his opposition to the Peloponnesian War. It was performed in 411 B.C. at a time when Athens was in serious danger of losing the war. It had a comic but effective message. Essentially, the reigning message within the text is that women were highly involved during wars, albeit they haven’t received much credit, which is highly deserved. Women fulfilled valuable tasks in times of war, both at home and on foreign campaigns. However, most of what hat we know about Greek women's attitude towards war comes mostly through male writers.

Women in the Lysistrata wanted the war to be stopped. It wasn’t for humanitarian or ideological reasons, but because women honestly missed their husbands and wanted them to come back home. The women in Aristophanes’ Lysistrata are worthy of a further note because of their transgressive nature. They break barriers by taking direct action in the male sphere of military politics. They even seize, and then hold the Acropolis by force. Although we are specking of fictional events and characters, there’s a distinct parallel with the storyline and women, and what they represent. Women are portrayed as strong and fearless defenders of their family in the Lysistrata, however, they are also portrayed as being cunning and devious, and able to abstain from sex in order to get what they ultimately want. Their husbands back from war. Lysistrata’s approach to this particular idea was vile and comedic in its execution, when she states, “Do you not miss your husband’s pricks? Your sons’ father? I mean while he’s away at war? I know very well that all of you have your husband away at the moment. Not one of them is here with you. Isn’t that so?”

Classical scholars such as Plutarch, Aristotle, and Xenophon have noted several strong relationships pertaining to women’s roles in warfare. In truth, the stereotypical idea of women at home, taking care of offspring, was the expectation of women in warfare during the classical period. However, there are several examples of women throughout history who have broken this idea down to its core. Spartan women were fiercely patriotic and admirers of bravery on the battlefield. According to Plutarch, the physical training that Spartan girls and women underwent was designed to prepare them to defend themselves, their children, and their country . Yet, it appears that they were not, in fact, trained to fight actual battles, nor are they indeed ever portrayed as taking part in military campaigns . Aristotle explains that when the Spartan men were absent from home for long periods of time, the whole country was in the hands of women, mostly because of the number of heiresses, and because large dowries are customary. This is quite complimentary to the Lysistrata, in that, the men were far from home and the ultimate goal of the women was to find a way to bring them back.

Xenophon explains women in both Sparta and Athens stating that God has made man to endure cold temperatures, outdoor tasks, journeys and campaigns. “To the women, since he has made her body less capable of such endurance; I take it that God has assigned her indoor tasks.” Essentially Xenophon is explaining the fact that women were expected to stay at home, bare children, send out servants whose work is outside, and delegate tasks to those servants who work inside. Food must always be fresh and ready for preparation and people that fall ill in the household will need caring for. This was the role of women during warfare. The fact that the Lysistrata was written in opposition to all expected norms and social roles, leads me to believe that either Aristophanes was poking fun at women, or essentially, he secretly supported a women’s right to fight.

As stated previously, the Lysistrata is based on fictional women and events, however one such myth, recognizable to almost every person you can speak to on the matter, brings myth to life. The myth of the Amazon woman. Most scholars are cautious about making any claims for the historicity of such warrior women. Plutarch lists a number of scholars who did not believe in the Amazons and Strabo claims that these stories are 'beyond belief’ . And the fact that Arrian felt the need to justify his belief that the Amazons had once existed, though no longer in his own time, also implies that some doubt concerning the existence of the Amazons was present already in Antiquity .

What, however, do the Amazon women have to do with the women of Lysistrata? Amazonian women were a tribe of warriors. They represent everything a Greek woman is not supposed to be. “The Amazons, who were beaten by Greek men, acted as 'negative role models'. So, among other things, the Amazon myth helped to reinforce the ideology that in a civilized Greek society women were expected to marry and let their men do the politics and the fighting.” This is essentially the reason why the men in the Lysistrata found it so odd and off kilter to see a women campaigning for political reasons, and outside her defined position in society.

In closing, the Lysistrata teaches us that women were not mere spectators of war. They had motivation to be involved, albeit not on the battlefield. They provided spiritual and emotional support to their men, and this was invaluable to their success. During the Hellenistic period, many soldiers took their wives and children with them on campaigns. Arguably, many campaigns would not have been fought unless the soldiers were given the right to bring their loved ones along. The Lysistrata, I believe, is a female’s perspective written from the voice of a male, in light of the fact that they were left behind, and they do in fact have value in warfare.

Related Content:






Sources

  1. Aristophanes. Lysistrata 100-115.
  2. Blundell, Sue. Women in Ancient Greece. London: Harvard University Press, 1995.
  3. Dunstan, William E. Ancient Greece. Orlando: Harcourt College Publishers, 2000.
  4. Gabriel, Richard A. Philip II of Macedonia: Greater Than Alexander. Dulles: Potomac Books, Inc, 2010.
  5. Loman, Pasi. "No Woman No War: Women's Participation in Ancient Greek Warfare." Greece & Rome, Second Series. 51. No. 1 (2004): 34-54.
  6. Pomeroy, Sarah B. Spartan Women. New York: Oxford University Press, USA; First Edition, 2002.
  7. Spielvogel, Jackson J. Western Civilization. 7th Edition. Belmont: Thomson Higher Education, 2009.

Wednesday, June 2, 2010

Mbamelke African Bronze Judgment Chair



Throughout history, cultures have used various types of torture devices to force the truth, or in this case a confession. Many West and Central African tribes used "judgment chairs" in their criminal trials, chairs that were believed to have the power to the reveal the truth. This intricately decorated chair was used by the Mbamelke of Cameroon. The Mbamelke used separate chairs for both male and females. If you notice, the figures on the chair depict male and female spirits.

The accused was forced to sit in the chair during the trial and if they were found guilty of a crime, such as murder or adultery, they would actually be executed while sitting in the chair. I had the chance to sit in the chair, and for some reason, it just had a sort of macabre feeling about it. Now you know why.

Also check out:

Tuesday, May 25, 2010

Discovery News: Ancient Weapons Emerge from The Ice


Ironically, weapons have been the topic of conversation on Ancient Digger this week, so I was thrilled to see that more ancient weapons have been revealed. As the ice patches melt away in Canada's Mackenzie Mountains, history is revealed in the form of 2400 year old ancient weapons.
The weapons, which include a 2,400-year-old spear throwing tools, a 1,000-year-old ground squirrel snare, and bows and arrows dating back 850 years, have been found high in the remote Mackenzie Mountains, a region where Mountain Boreal caribou abound in the summer months.
"Following that discovery,  we recovered more than 200 ancient hunting artifacts, with the oldest dating back more than 9,000 years," Greg Hare, the Yukon archaeologist who analyzed the original discovery, told Discovery News.

Read more on Discovery about the Ancient Weapons found in the Arctic

Saturday, May 22, 2010

Historical Weaponry in St. Augustine


Tools of Torture

This week has been a trip back into the historically bizarre and unusual. On a whim, I decided to take a road trip to St. Augustine. It wasn't to see the archaeology in the city, like Castilllo De San Marco, which is strange for me. I wanted to experience the truly strange aspects of the oldest city in Florida.

So where did I find myself? Well, Ripley's Believe It or Not of course. I am doing a series of posts on some of the artifacts I'm explored this week in St. Augustine, and the weaponry at Ripley's was more than fascinating.

Chinese Fetters



During the 20th century, several European countries and Japan attempted to exploit China. Japan was notorious for imprisoning and torturing anyone that resisted. The wooden collar fetters, or restraints, were used by the Japanese to transport Chinese farmers to industrial centers.

Medieval Hand Crusher



This hand crusher was used during the Middle Ages to force a confession. The thumb and hand screws were tightened on the criminal until they confessed. Those who did not were crippled. They would have still succumb to a sentence of death for their crimes.

German Execution Axe



Prior to the invention of the guillotine in the 18th century, these long sturdy axes were used by executioners to provide a swift blow to the head. Unfortunately, using this method led to many misses by the executioners, resulting in the horror of needing multiple chops to finish the job.

Also check out Weird and Wonderful Objects From The First Ripleys in St. Augustine Florida at my new website, The TravelSphere.

All pictures taken by Author.

Like Ancient Digger? Why Not Follow Us?


Subscribe Via RSS Feed Follow Ancient Digger on Facebook Follow Ancient Digger on Twitter Subscribe to Ancient Digger Via Email

Get widget

Search

 

Ancient Digger Archaeology Copyright © 2015 LKart Theme is Designed by Lasantha